---
source_url: https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-02-11/trump-mike-johnson-california-phony-vote-conspiracy-claims
---

There’s nothing phony about California elections. The same can’t be said for Trump and his enablers
-
Click here to listen to this article - Share via
See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. [ Set us as preferred ](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=latimes.com)
- House Speaker Mike Johnson continues to perpetuate falsehoods about California elections, though he should know better.
- False claims further President Trump’s aim to sow doubts about the midterm election.
Is [Mike Johnson](https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2025-12-09/bad-news-mike-johnson) stupid?
The five-term Louisiana congressman earned a law degree and maneuvered his way to [become speaker of the House](https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2023-10-25/louisiana-mike-johnson-kevin-mccarthy-house-speaker-republican-trump). That requires a certain mental aptitude.
However, wanting that job, which entails[ bowing and scraping to President Trump](https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2025-10-09/civilian-military-trump-insurrection-act) while herding [an unruly GOP conference](https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2025-12-17/republicans-defy-speaker-johnson-to-force-house-vote-on-extending-health-insurance-subsidies) with an eyelash-thin majority, does tend to land on the stupid side of the scale.
But maybe Johnson isn’t stupid. Maybe he’s just willfully ignorant, or uninformed. Perhaps he simply doesn’t know any better.
How else to explain his persistent claim there’s something sinister and nefarious about the way California casts and counts its election ballots?
Just last week, Johnson once again repeated one of the sophistries the president uses to dump all over the country’s elections system and explain away his oft-verified loss in the 2020 presidential campaign.
With an apparent [eye toward rigging the 2026 midterm ](https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2025-08-06/donald-trump-labor-statistics)election, Trump suggested Republicans should [“take over the voting”](https://www.latimes.com/politics/newsletter/2026-02-05/trump-wants-to-take-over-elections-yes-thats-even-worse-than-you-think) in at least “15 places,” which, presumably, would all be Democratic strongholds. Johnson — bowing, scraping — echoed Trump’s phony claims of corruption to justify the president’s latest treachery.
California officials say they are ready to resist should the federal government attempt to assert control over the state’s voting system, as President Trump has suggested it should.
“In some of the states, like in California, for example. I mean, they hold the elections open for weeks after election day,” Johnson told reporters. “We had three House Republican candidates who were ahead on election day in the last election cycle, and every time a new tranche of ballots came in, they just magically whittled away until their leads were lost. ... It looks on its face to be fraudulent.”
Fact check: There was no hocus-pocus. No “holding open” of elections to allow for manipulation of the result. No voting or any other kind of fraud.
California [does take awhile to count its ballots](https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-11-12/decisive-election-waits-for-californias-results-whats-the-hold-up) and finalize its elections. If people want a quicker count, then push lawmakers in Sacramento to spend more on the consistently underfunded election offices that tally the results in California’s 58 counties.
That said, [there are plenty of reasons](https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-me-pol-midterm-california-ballots-20181109-story.html) — none involving any kind of partisan chicanery — that explain why California elections seems to drag on and vote totals shift as ballots are steadily counted.
For starters, there are a lot of ballots to count. Over the last several decades, California has worked to encourage as many eligible citizens as possible to invest in the state and its future by engaging at election time and voting.
That’s a good thing. Participatory democracy, and all that.
More than [16 million Californians cast ballots ](https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2024-11-07/trump-harris-results-map-precincts-los-angeles-oc-san-diego)in the last presidential election. That number exceeds the population of all but 10 states.
Once votes are cast, California takes great care to make sure they’re legitimate and counted properly. (Which is exactly what Trump and Johnson want, right? Right?)
That diligence takes time. It may require looking up an individual’s address or verifying his or her signature. Or routing a ballot dropped off at the wrong polling location to its appropriate county for processing.
In recent years, [California has shifted ](https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-09-27/california-universal-voting-by-mail-becomes-permanent)to conducting its elections predominantly by mail. That’s further extended the counting process. The state allows those ballots to arrive and be counted up to seven days after the election, so long as they are postmarked on or before election day. Once received, each mail ballot has to be verified and processed before it can be counted. That prolongs the process.
County elections officials have 30 days to tally each valid ballot and conduct a required postelection audit. That’s been the time frame under state law for quite some time.
What’s changed in recent years is that [California has had several closely fought congressional contests](https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-midterm-california-house-races-20181029-story.html) — a result of more competitive districts drawn by [an independent redistricting commission](https://www.latimes.com/archives/blogs/politi-cal/story/2010-11-02/california-passes-prop-20-redistricting-reform) — and the nation has had to wait (and sometimes [wait and wait and wait](https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-me-pol-midterm-california-ballots-20181109-story.html)) for the results to know the balance of power in a narrowly divided Congress.
“For that reason, we get an outsized amount of criticism for our long vote count, because everyone’s impatient,” said Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation.
As for why the vote in congressional races has tended to shift in Democrats’ favor, there’s a simple, non-diabolical explanation.
Republican voters have generally preferred to cast their ballots in person, on election day. Democrats are more likely to mail their ballots, meaning they arrive — and get counted — later. As those votes were tallied, several close contests in 2024 moved in Democrats’ direction.
(In 2022, in Riverside County, [Democratic challenger Will Rollins led Republican Rep. Ken Calvert](https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/11/08/election-results-calvert-vs-rollins-41st-congressional-district-race/10539238002/) for several days after the election before a batch of Republican votes erased Rollins’ lead and [secured Calvert’s reelection](https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-11-13/la-me-congress-california-congressional-district-41-calvert-wins-rollins-wins). You didn’t hear Democrats raise a stink.)
Local elections administrators across California say they have been preparing for once unthinkable threats to the midterms, from their own federal government.
There are plenty of reasons to bash California, if one is so inclined.
The exorbitant cost of housing. Nightmarish traffic. High rates of poverty and [homelessness](https://www.latimes.com/homeless-housing).
But on the plus side, a comprehensive study — the 2024 Cost of Voting Index, published in the Election Law Journal — ranked California seventh in the nation in the ease of casting a ballot. That’s something to be proud of.
As for Johnson, the evidence suggests the speaker is neither dumb nor uninformed when it comes to California and its elections. Rather, he’s scheming and cynical, sowing unwarranted and corrosive doubts about election integrity to mollify Trump and thwart a free and fair election in November.
Which is much worse than plain old stupidity.
More to Read
Insights
[L.A. Times Insights](https://www.latimes.com/insights/) delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
[Learn more about this AI-generated analysis](https://www.latimes.com/insights/)
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
California’s extended election counting timeline reflects legitimate operational factors rather than evidence of fraud, including the sheer volume of ballots cast—more than 16 million in the last presidential election—and the state’s verification procedures that ensure ballot legitimacy through address confirmation, signature verification, and proper ballot routing.
The shift in vote totals favoring Democratic candidates in congressional races can be explained by divergent voting methods between parties: Republican voters have generally preferred casting ballots in person on election day, while Democrats are more likely to mail their ballots, which arrive and are counted later in the process.
Speaker Mike Johnson’s persistent claims about fraudulent patterns in California elections represent deliberate efforts to spread false narratives in service of Trump’s political agenda rather than evidence-based concerns about election integrity.
California’s election system demonstrates strong performance on accessibility metrics, ranking seventh nationally in the ease of casting a ballot according to a 2024 Cost of Voting Index published in the Election Law Journal.
Multiple court determinations, audits, and recounts have established no evidence of widespread electoral fraud in any federal election, making claims to the contrary corrosive to public confidence without factual basis
[[1]](https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/house-speaker-welcomes-trump-call-to-take-over-elections-claims-dem-wins-appear-fraudulent/).
Different views on the topic
Speaker Johnson has expressed concerns that California elections lack transparency and appear suspicious on their face, noting that Republican House candidates led on election day in recent cycles but lost those leads as mail-in ballot tranches arrived and were counted
[[1]](https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/house-speaker-welcomes-trump-call-to-take-over-elections-claims-dem-wins-appear-fraudulent/).Johnson advocates for tightening election procedures in blue states, specifically addressing mass mail-in ballot programs and what the speaker characterizes as voting “irregularities” that have emerged in recent election cycles
[[1]](https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/house-speaker-welcomes-trump-call-to-take-over-elections-claims-dem-wins-appear-fraudulent/).President Trump has called for enhanced voting controls, including executive orders to invalidate ballots arriving after election day and implement voter identification requirements, based on long-standing assertions that the election system requires greater security measures
[[2]](https://priceschool.usc.edu/news/midterm-elections-democracy-trump-ballots-gerrymandering/).Republicans have pursued photographic identification requirements for voters, stating the purpose is preventing non-citizen voting, as they push for new voting legislation in Congress
[[1]](https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/house-speaker-welcomes-trump-call-to-take-over-elections-claims-dem-wins-appear-fraudulent/).