D.C. Circuit Panel Signals Trump's Executive Orders Sanctioning Law Firms Are Likely Unlawful

A three-judge D.C. Circuit panel heard arguments on President Trump's executive orders targeting four major law firms that represented his perceived political enemies. The orders revoked security clearances, suspended government contracts, and barred attorneys from federal buildings. The panel appeared skeptical of the administration's position, questioning whether Trump's targeting of firms constituted a defensible use of presidential authority over security clearances. Attorney Paul Clement, representing the firms, argued Trump used a 'blunderbuss' approach and that the punishments 'strike at the heart of the rule of law.' Four separate district court judges had previously granted permanent restraining orders, determining the executive orders violated the First Amendment and other constitutional provisions. The targeted firms included Perkins Coie (represented Democratic clients in election cases), Covington & Burling (represented Trump impeachment witnesses), Paul Weiss (represen...

"These punishments strike at the heart of the rule of law" — Attorney Paul Clement's argument before the D.C. Circuit panel, characterizing Trump's executive orders targeting law firms that represented his political opponents